Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Genomics. 2014 Dec 23;15:1174. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1174.

Quantification of epigenetic biomarkers: an evaluation of established and emerging methods for DNA methylation analysis.

Author information

1
LGC, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LY, UK. Nicholas.Redshaw@lgcgroup.com.
2
LGC, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LY, UK. Jim.Huggett@lgcgroup.com.
3
Medical and Developmental Genetics Section, MRC Human Genetics Unit, IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. martin.taylor@igmm.ed.ac.uk.
4
LGC, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LY, UK. Carole.Foy@lgcgroup.com.
5
LGC, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LY, UK. Alison.Devonshire@lgcgroup.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism in several human diseases, most notably cancer. The quantitative analysis of DNA methylation patterns has the potential to serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, however, there is currently a lack of consensus regarding the optimal methodologies to quantify methylation status. To address this issue we compared five analytical methods: (i) MethyLight qPCR, (ii) MethyLight digital PCR (dPCR), methylation-sensitive and -dependent restriction enzyme (MSRE/MDRE) digestion followed by (iii) qPCR or (iv) dPCR, and (v) bisulfite amplicon next generation sequencing (NGS). The techniques were evaluated for linearity, accuracy and precision.

RESULTS:

MethyLight qPCR displayed the best linearity across the range of tested samples. Observed methylation measured by MethyLight- and MSRE/MDRE-qPCR and -dPCR were not significantly different to expected values whilst bisulfite amplicon NGS analysis over-estimated methylation content. Bisulfite amplicon NGS showed good precision, whilst the lower precision of qPCR and dPCR analysis precluded discrimination of differences of < 25% in methylation status. A novel dPCR MethyLight assay is also described as a potential method for absolute quantification that simultaneously measures both sense and antisense DNA strands following bisulfite treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings comprise a comprehensive benchmark for the quantitative accuracy of key methods for methylation analysis and demonstrate their applicability to the quantification of circulating tumour DNA biomarkers by using sample concentrations that are representative of typical clinical isolates.

PMID:
25539843
PMCID:
PMC4523014
DOI:
10.1186/1471-2164-15-1174
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center