Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jan;40:180-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.12.005. Epub 2014 Dec 18.

Anger self-management in chronic traumatic brain injury: protocol for a psycho-educational treatment with a structurally equivalent control and an evaluation of treatment enactment.

Author information

1
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: thart@einstein.edu.
2
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
3
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
4
Seattle Anger Management and Domestic Violence Programs, Seattle, WA, USA.
5
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA.

Abstract

Anger and irritability are important and persistent clinical problems following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Treatment options include medications, behavioral modification, and psychotherapies, but some are impractical and none have proven efficacy with this population. We describe a randomized multi-center clinical trial testing a novel, one-on-one, 8-session psychoeducational treatment program, Anger Self-Management Training (ASMT), designed specifically for people with TBI who have significant cognitive impairment. The trial is notable for its use of a structurally equivalent comparison treatment, called Personal Readjustment and Education (PRE), which was created for the study and is intended to maximize equipoise for both participants and treaters. Fidelity assessment is conducted in real time and used in therapist supervision sessions. The primary outcome is change in self-reported anger on validated measures from pre-treatment to 1 week after the final session. Secondary outcomes include participant anger as reported by a significant other; emotional distress in domains other than anger/irritability; behavioral functioning; and quality of life. An interim assessment after the 4th session will allow examination of the trajectory of any observed treatment effects, and a follow-up assessment 2 months after the end of intervention will allow examination of persistence of effects. A treatment enactment phase, in which participants are interviewed several months after the last therapy session, is designed to provide qualitative data on whether and to what extent the principles and techniques learned in treatment are still carried out in daily life.

KEYWORDS:

Anger management; Brain injuries; Problem solving; Psychological treatment

PMID:
25530306
PMCID:
PMC4314341
DOI:
10.1016/j.cct.2014.12.005
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center