Image quality and dose distributions of three linac-based imaging modalities

Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 Apr;191(4):365-74. doi: 10.1007/s00066-014-0798-7. Epub 2014 Dec 20.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Linac-based patient imaging is possible with a variety of techniques using different photon energies. The purpose of this work is to compare three imaging systems operating at 6 MV, flattening free filter (FFF) 1 MV, and 121 kV.

Patients and methods: The dose distributions of all pretreatment set-up images (over 1,000) were retrospectively calculated on the planning computed tomography (CT) images for all patients with prostate and head-and-neck cancer treated at our institution in 2013. We analyzed the dose distribution and the dose to organs at risk.

Results: For head-and-neck cancer patients, the imaging dose from 6-MV cone beam CT (CBCT) reached maximum values at around 8 cGy. The 1-MV CBCT dose was about 63-79 % of the 6-MV CBCT dose for all organs at risk. Planar imaging reduced the imaging dose from CBCT to 30-40 % for both megavoltage modalities. The dose from the kilovoltage CBCT was 4-10 % of the 6-MV CBCT dose. For prostate cancer patients, the maximum dose from 6-MV CBCT reached 13-15 cGy, and was reduced to 66-73 % for 1 MV. Planar imaging reduces the MV CBCT dose to 10-20 %. The kV CBCT dose is 15-20 % of the 6-MV CBCT dose, slightly higher than the dose from MV axes. The dose distributions differ markedly in response to the different beam profiles and dose-depth characteristics.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Neoplasms / radiotherapy*
  • Particle Accelerators*
  • Radiation Dosage*
  • Radiation Protection / methods*
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Radiotherapy, Image-Guided / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*