Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135.

Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range.

Author information

1
Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. xwan@comp.hkbu.edu.hk.
2
Department of Statistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. wenqianwang2014@u.northwestern.edu.
3
Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. jiming@comp.hkbu.edu.hk.
4
Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. tongt@hkbu.edu.hk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In systematic reviews and meta-analysis, researchers often pool the results of the sample mean and standard deviation from a set of similar clinical trials. A number of the trials, however, reported the study using the median, the minimum and maximum values, and/or the first and third quartiles. Hence, in order to combine results, one may have to estimate the sample mean and standard deviation for such trials.

METHODS:

In this paper, we propose to improve the existing literature in several directions. First, we show that the sample standard deviation estimation in Hozo et al.'s method (BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13, 2005) has some serious limitations and is always less satisfactory in practice. Inspired by this, we propose a new estimation method by incorporating the sample size. Second, we systematically study the sample mean and standard deviation estimation problem under several other interesting settings where the interquartile range is also available for the trials.

RESULTS:

We demonstrate the performance of the proposed methods through simulation studies for the three frequently encountered scenarios, respectively. For the first two scenarios, our method greatly improves existing methods and provides a nearly unbiased estimate of the true sample standard deviation for normal data and a slightly biased estimate for skewed data. For the third scenario, our method still performs very well for both normal data and skewed data. Furthermore, we compare the estimators of the sample mean and standard deviation under all three scenarios and present some suggestions on which scenario is preferred in real-world applications.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this paper, we discuss different approximation methods in the estimation of the sample mean and standard deviation and propose some new estimation methods to improve the existing literature. We conclude our work with a summary table (an Excel spread sheet including all formulas) that serves as a comprehensive guidance for performing meta-analysis in different situations.

PMID:
25524443
PMCID:
PMC4383202
DOI:
10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center