Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Mar;114(3):430-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu383. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and survival after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair†.

Author information

1
Academic Surgery Unit, Education and Research Centre and National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
2
National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK Centre for Health Informatics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
3
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK.
4
Academic Surgery Unit, Education and Research Centre and.
5
Manchester Royal Infirmary, Department of Anaesthesia, Central Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
6
Academic Surgery Unit, Education and Research Centre and cnmcc@manchester.ac.uk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is increasingly used in the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing major surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate whether CPET can identify patients at risk of reduced survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

METHODS:

Prospectively collected data from consecutive patients who underwent CPET before elective open or endovascular AAA repair  (EVAR) at two tertiary vascular centres between January 2007 and October 2012 were analysed. A symptom-limited maximal CPET was performed on each patient. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modelling was used to identify risk factors associated with reduced survival.

RESULTS:

The study included 506 patients with a mean age of 73.4 (range 44-90). The majority (82.6%) were men and most (64.6%) underwent EVAR. The in-hospital mortality was 2.6%. The median follow-up was 26 months. The 3-year survival for patients with zero or one sub-threshold CPET value ([Formula: see text] at AT<10.2 ml kg(-1) min(-1), peak [Formula: see text]<15 ml kg(-1) min(-1) or [Formula: see text] at AT>42) was 86.4% compared with 59.9% for patients with three sub-threshold CPET values. Risk factors independently associated with survival were female sex [hazard ratio (HR)=0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.85, P=0.015], diabetes (HR=1.95, 95% CI 1.04-3.69, P=0.039), preoperative statins (HR=0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.90, P=0.016), haemoglobin g dl(-1) (HR=0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95, P=0.006), peak [Formula: see text]<15 ml kg(-1) min(-1) (HR=1.63, 95% CI 1.01-2.63, P=0.046), and [Formula: see text] at AT>42 (HR=1.68, 95% CI 1.00-2.80, P=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS:

CPET variables are independent predictors of reduced survival after elective AAA repair and can identify a cohort of patients with reduced survival at 3 years post-procedure. CPET is a potentially useful adjunct for clinical decision-making in patients with AAA.

KEYWORDS:

abdominal aortic aneurysm; cardiopulmonary exercise test; cardiovascular surgical procedure; endovascular procedures

PMID:
25481223
DOI:
10.1093/bja/aeu383
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center