Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jun;26(6):1101-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu563. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

Visceral adiposity and colorectal adenomas: dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.

Author information

1
Department of Nutrition and Epidemiology nak212@mail.harvard.edu.
2
Department of Nutrition and Epidemiology.
3
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
4
Division of Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
5
Department of Nutrition and Epidemiology Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Obesity-related hormonal and metabolic perturbations implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis are mainly driven by visceral adipose tissue (VAT) rather than subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Yet, most epidemiologic studies have examined the relationship between excess adiposity and colorectal neoplasia using body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). Due to the inability of BMI and WC to distinguish VAT from SAT, they are likely to have underestimated the true association.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to summarize the relationships between VAT and colorectal adenomas and to examine the value of VAT as an independent risk factor beyond BMI, WC, and SAT. PubMed and Embase were searched through September 2014 to identify relevant observational studies. The summary odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS:

In linear dose-response meta-analysis, the summary OR for each 25 cm(2) increase in VAT area was 1.13 (95% CI 1.05-1.21; I(2) = 62%; 6 studies; 2776 cases; range of VAT area = 30-228 cm(2)). The dose-response curve suggested no evidence of nonlinearity (Pnon-linearity = 0.37). In meta-analysis comparing the highest versus lowest category of VAT based on 12 studies, a positive association between VAT and adenomas remained statistically significant even after adjustment for BMI, WC, and SAT. In contrast, adjustment for VAT substantially attenuated associations of BMI, WC, and SAT with adenomas. Across the studies, VAT was more strongly associated with advanced adenomas than nonadvanced adenomas.

CONCLUSIONS:

VAT may be the underlying mediator of the observed associations of BMI and WC with adenomas, increasing adenoma risk continuously over a wide range of VAT area. Considering that the joint use of BMI and WC better captures VAT than the use of either one, clinicians are recommended to use both BMI and WC to identify those at high risk for colorectal neoplasia.

KEYWORDS:

colorectal adenomas; dose–response meta-analysis; observational studies; visceral adipose tissue; visceral adiposity

PMID:
25480876
DOI:
10.1093/annonc/mdu563
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for White Rose Research Online
Loading ...
Support Center