Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Jan;84(1):76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Oct 12.

Understanding data requirements of retrospective studies.

Author information

1
Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
2
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, United States.
3
Meliorix Inc., La Jolla, CA, United States. Electronic address: aziz.boxwala@meliorix.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:

Usage of data from electronic health records (EHRs) in clinical research is increasing, but there is little empirical knowledge of the data needed to support multiple types of research these sources support. This study seeks to characterize the types and patterns of data usage from EHRs for clinical research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We analyzed the data requirements of over 100 retrospective studies by mapping the selection criteria and study variables to data elements of two standard data dictionaries, one from the healthcare domain and the other from the clinical research domain. We also contacted study authors to validate our results.

RESULTS:

The majority of variables mapped to one or to both of the two dictionaries. Studies used an average of 4.46 (range 1-12) data element types in the selection criteria and 6.44 (range 1-15) in the study variables. The most frequently used items (e.g., procedure, condition, medication) are often available in coded form in EHRs. Study criteria were frequently complex, with 49 of 104 studies involving relationships between data elements and 22 of the studies using aggregate operations for data variables. Author responses supported these findings.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:

The high proportion of mapped data elements demonstrates the significant potential for clinical data warehousing to facilitate clinical research. Unmapped data elements illustrate the difficulty in developing a complete data dictionary.

KEYWORDS:

Data models; Data standards; Queries

PMID:
25453276
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.10.004
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center