Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014 Dec;29(10):1139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

Re-evaluating the functional implications of the Q-angle and its relationship to in-vivo patellofemoral kinematics.

Author information

1
Functional and Applied Biomechanics, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: bfreed@seas.upenn.edu.
2
Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
3
Functional and Applied Biomechanics, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The Q-angle is widely used clinically to evaluate individuals with anterior knee pain. Recent studies have questioned the utility of this measure and have suggested that a large Q-angle may not be associated with lateral patellofemoral translation, as often assumed. The objective of this study was to determine: 1) how accurately the Q-angle represents the line-of-action of the quadriceps and 2) if adding active quadriceps contraction or a bent knee position to the measurement of the Q-angle improves its reliability, accuracy, and association with patellofemoral kinematics.

METHODS:

The study included individuals diagnosed with chronic idiopathic patellofemoral pain and control subjects (n=43 and n=30 knees). Three measures of the clinical Q-angle (straight- and bent-knee with relaxed quadriceps and straight-knee with maximum isometric quadriceps contraction) were obtained with a goniometer and compared to a fourth MR-based measure of Q-angle. Patellofemoral kinematics were derived from dynamic cine-phase contrast images, acquired while subjects extended/flexed their knee from approximately 0° and 45°.

FINDINGS:

The Q-angle did not represent the line-of-action of the quadriceps. The average difference between each clinical and the MR-based Q-angle ranged from 5° to 8°. These differences varied greatly across subjects (range: -28.5° to 3.9(o)). Adding an active quadriceps contraction or a bent knee position, did not improve the reliability of the Q-angle. An increased Q-angle correlated to medial patellar displacement and tilt (r=0.38-0.54, P<0.001) in the cohort with anterior knee pain.

INTERPRETATION:

Clinicians are cautioned against using the Q-angle to infer patellofemoral kinematics.

KEYWORDS:

Kinematics; Knee; Magnetic resonance imaging; Patellofemoral joint; Patellofemoral pain syndrome

PMID:
25451861
PMCID:
PMC4255138
DOI:
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.09.012
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center