Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Med Eng Phys. 2014 Dec;36(12):1644-55. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

Operational challenges of retinal prostheses.

Author information

1
Institute of Theoretical Physics, Tübingen University, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. Electronic address: erich.schmid@uni-tuebingen.de.
2
Visual and Autonomous Exploration Systems Research Laboratory, Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; Visual and Autonomous Exploration Systems Research Laboratory, Departments of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
3
Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Dresden, Germany.

Abstract

Two computational models for research on retinal implants are presented. In the first model, the electric field produced by a multi-electrode array in a uniform retina is calculated. It is shown how cross talk of activated electrodes and the resulting bunching of field lines in monopole and dipole activation prevent high resolution imaging with retinal implants. Furthermore, it is demonstrated how sequential stimulation and multipolar stimulation may overcome this limitation. In the second model a target volume, i.e., a probe cylinder approximating a bipolar cell, in the retina is chosen, and the passive Heaviside cable equation is solved inside this target volume to calculate the depolarization of the cell membrane. The depolarization as a function of time indicates that shorter signals stimulate better as long as the current does not change sign during stimulation of the retina, i.e., mono-phasic stimulation. Both computational models are equally applicable to epiretinal, subretinal, and suprachoroidal vision implants.

KEYWORDS:

Cross-talk; Electric current profile; Electric field profile; Electric field shaping; Electric stimulation; Epiretinal implant; Field line bunching; Phosphenes; Retinal prosthesis; Subretinal implant; Suprachoroidal implant

PMID:
25443535
DOI:
10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.09.004
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center