Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015 Jan;107(1):194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 21.

Evaluation of non-invasive screening measures to identify individuals with prediabetes.

Author information

1
University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States. Electronic address: kkv5@pitt.edu.
2
University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
3
University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.

Abstract

AIMS:

Because blood-based screening to identify those with prediabetes to take part in Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) translation efforts can be costly and time-consuming, non-invasive methods are needed. The aims of this paper are to evaluate the ability of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) risk test in identifying individuals with prediabetes, as well as the use of body composition measures for this purpose. In addition the utility of these alternate methods to ascertain the presence of the metabolic syndrome was assessed.

METHODS:

Potential participants were recruited from a worksite and three community centers to take part in a DPP translation study. Participants completed onsite screening where anthropometric measures, fasting lipids and glucose, and hemoglobin A1c were assessed. Those with a BMI ≥24 kg/m(2) and prediabetes and/or the metabolic syndrome were eligible to participate. Non-invasive screening methods were evaluated for their ability to identify those with prediabetes and the metabolic syndrome based on clinically measured values.

RESULTS:

All non-invasive methods were highly sensitive (68.9% to 98.5%) in the detection of prediabetes, but specificity was low (6.7% to 44.5%). None of the alternatives evaluated achieved acceptable discrimination levels in ROC analysis. Similar results were noted in identifying the metabolic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS:

The non-invasive methods evaluated in this study effectively identify participants with prediabetes, but would also allow for enrollment of a large number of individuals who do not have prediabetes. Deciding whether to use these alternatives, blood-based measures, or a combination of both will ultimately depend on the purpose of the program and the level of flexibility regarding participant eligibility.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01050205.

KEYWORDS:

Lifestyle intervention; Prediabetes; Screening

PMID:
25441924
PMCID:
PMC4747094
DOI:
10.1016/j.diabres.2014.06.003
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center