Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.047. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

Intravitreal Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with prompt versus deferred laser treatment: 5-year randomized trial results.

Author information

1
Elman Retina Group, Baltimore, Maryland.
2
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida. Electronic address: drcrstat1@jaeb.org.
3
Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
4
Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina.
5
Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon.
6
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
7
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
8
Retina Associates of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To report 5-year results from a previously reported trial evaluating intravitreal 0.5 mg ranibizumab with prompt versus deferred (for ≥24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN:

Multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS:

Among participants from the trial with 3 years of follow-up who subsequently consented to a 2-year extension and survived through 5 years, 124 (97%) and 111 (92%) completed the 5-year visit in the prompt and deferred groups, respectively.

METHODS:

Random assignment to ranibizumab every 4 weeks until no longer improving (with resumption if worsening) and prompt or deferred (≥24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Best-corrected visual acuity at the 5-year visit.

RESULTS:

The mean change in visual acuity letter score from baseline to the 5-year visit was +7.2 letters in the prompt laser group compared with +9.8 letters in the deferred laser group (mean difference, -2.6 letters; 95% confidence interval, -5.5 to +0.4 letters; P = 0.09). At the 5-year visit in the prompt versus deferred laser groups, there was vision loss of ≥10 letters in 9% versus 8%, an improvement of ≥10 letters in 46% versus 58%, and an improvement of ≥15 letters in 27% versus 38% of participants, respectively. From baseline to 5 years, 56% of participants in the deferred group did not receive laser. The median number of injections was 13 versus 17 in the prompt and deferral groups, including 54% and 45% receiving no injections during year 4 and 62% and 52% receiving no injections during year 5, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Five-year results suggest focal/grid laser treatment at the initiation of intravitreal ranibizumab is no better than deferring laser treatment for ≥24 weeks in eyes with DME involving the central macula with vision impairment. Although more than half of eyes in which laser treatment is deferred may avoid laser for at least 5 years, such eyes may require more injections to achieve these results when following this protocol. Most eyes treated with ranibizumab and either prompt or deferred laser maintain vision gains obtained by the first year through 5 years with little additional treatment after 3 years.

PMID:
25439614
PMCID:
PMC4520307
DOI:
10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.047
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center