Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Gait Posture. 2015 Jan;41(1):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Sep 20.

Proactive and reactive neuromuscular control in subjects with chronic ankle instability: evidence from a pilot study on landing.

Author information

1
KU Leuven Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: oron.levin@faber.kuleuven.be.
2
KU Leuven Human Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Leuven, Belgium.
3
KU Leuven Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Leuven, Belgium.
4
KU Leuven Research Group for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
5
KU Leuven Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Research, Development & Education, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Abstract

To understand why subjects with chronic ankle instability (CAI) have frequent sprains, one must study the preparation/reactions of these subjects to situations related to ankle inversion in real life. In the present pilot study, we examined whether subjects with CAI altered their neuromuscular control and reflex responses during and after ankle perturbations in landing. EMG signals were collected from the tibialis anterior (TA), peroneus longus (PL), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and gluteus medius (GLM) of both legs in 9 subjects with CAI and 9 subjects with intact ankles (control). A trapdoor was used to produce an ankle inversion of 25° with the left leg (control) or the affected leg (CAI) in 0%, 50% or 100% of the landing trials. As compared to controls, subjects with CAI had increased proactive activity in the contralateral side prior to touchdown during landing trials with 50% (PL) and 100% (PL and MG) chance of inversion (all, p < 0.05). The increase proactive control on the contralateral side could be part of a strategy to smooth the impact of landing on the affected side in subjects with CAI. Following touchdown, the CAI group showed decreased ipsilateral short latency reflex (SLR) responses in all test conditions both in distal (PL and MG) and in proximal muscles (GLM) on the affected side (all, p < 0.05). Finally, subjects with CAI adjusted their reflex gain differently as compared to controls when exposed to a possible inversion. Overall, individuals with CAI displayed different neuromuscular strategies from controls while landing.

KEYWORDS:

Ankle sprain; Anticipation; Inversion; Landing; Reflex

PMID:
25439444
DOI:
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.09.005
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center