Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015 Mar;21(1):37-46. doi: 10.1037/xap0000037. Epub 2014 Dec 1.

The influence of different graphical displays on nonexpert decision making under uncertainty.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology.
2
Section on Integrative Neuroimaging, Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, National Institutes of Health.
3
School of Computing, University of Utah.

Abstract

Understanding how people interpret and use visually presented uncertainty data is an important yet seldom studied aspect of data visualization applications. Current approaches in visualization often display uncertainty as an additional data attribute without a well-defined context. Our goal was to test whether different graphical displays (glyphs) would influence a decision about which of 2 weather forecasts was a more accurate predictor of an uncertain temperature forecast value. We used a statistical inference task based on fictional univariate normal distributions, each characterized by a mean and standard deviation. Participants viewed 1 of 5 different glyph types representing 2 weather forecast distributions. Three of these used variations in spatial encoding to communicate the distributions and the other 2 used nonspatial encoding (brightness or color). Four distribution pairs were created with different relative standard deviations (uncertainty of the forecasts). We found that there was a difference in how decisions were made with spatial versus nonspatial glyphs, but no difference among the spatial glyphs themselves. Furthermore, the effect of different glyph types changed as a function of the variability of the distributions. The results are discussed in the context of how visualizations might improve decision making under uncertainty.

PMID:
25437794
DOI:
10.1037/xap0000037
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for American Psychological Association
Loading ...
Support Center