Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Biol Sport. 2014 Dec;31(4):261-6. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1120932. Epub 2014 Sep 12.

THE GSTP1 c.313A>G POLYMORPHISM MODULATES THE CARDIORESPIRATORY RESPONSE TO AEROBIC TRAINING.

Author information

1
Academy of Physical Education and Sport, Department of Tourism and Recreation, Gdansk, Poland.
2
Academy of Physical Education and Sport, Department of Tourism and Recreation, Gdansk, Poland ; Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Clinical and Molecular Biochemistry, Szczecin, Poland.
3
University of Szczecin, Department of Physical Culture and Health Promotion, Szczecin, Poland.
4
University of Rzeszów, Department of Physical Culture, Rzeszow, Poland.
5
Institute of Sport, Department of Physiology, Institute of Sport, Warsaw, Poland.
6
Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Australia.

Abstract

The GSTP1 c.313A>G polymorphism is a candidate to explain some of the individual differences in cardiorespiratory fitness phenotypes' responses to aerobic exercise training. We aim to explore the association between the GSTP1 c.313A>G polymorphism and the response to low-high impact aerobic exercise training. Sixty-six Polish Caucasian women were genotyped for the GSTP1 c.313A>G polymorphism; 62 of them completed 12-week aerobic (50-75% HRmax) exercise training and were measured for selected somatic features (body mass and BMI) and cardiorespiratory fitness indices - maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max, maximum heart rate (HRmax), maximum ventilation (VEmax) and anaerobic threshold (AT) - before and after the training period. Two-factor analysis of variance revealed a main training effect for body mass reduction (p=0.007) and BMI reduction (p=0.013), improvements of absolute and relative VO2max (both p<0.001), and increased VEmax (p=0.005), but not for changes in fat-free mass (FFM) (p=0.162). However, a significant training x GSTP1 c.313A>G interaction was found only for FFM (p=0.042), absolute and relative VO2max (p=0.029 and p=0.026), and VEmax (p=0.005). As the result of training, significantly greater improvements in VO2max, VEmax and FFM were gained by the GG+GA group compared to the AA genotype group. The results support the hypothesis that heterogeneity in individual response to training stimuli is at least in part determined by genetics, and GSTP1 c.313A>G may be considered as one (of what appear to be many) target polymorphisms to influence these changes.

KEYWORDS:

athletic performance; exercise; genes; polymorphism

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center