Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Urol J. 2014 Nov 30;11(6):1944-50.

Quality of life survey following laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy.

Author information

1
Department of Urology, Acibadem University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
2
Department of Urology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.. cybilen@yahoo.com.
3
Department of Urology, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
4
Department of Urology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
5
Department of Urology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
6
Department of Urology, Goztepe Educational and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
7
Department of Urology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To compare the quality of life (QoL) of renal cancer patients following laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Seventy-two (64.9%) patients who were treated with open radical nephrectomy (ORN group) and 39 (35.1%) patients who were treated with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN group) were included in this study. QoL was evaluated by Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical domain scores obtained before surgery, 1 and 6 months after surgery. Analgesic requirement and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores following surgeries were recorded.

RESULTS:

The demographic features of the groups were similar. There was a significant difference in tumor size be­tween the ORN group (71.59 & plusmn; 29.83 mm) and LRN group (57.08 & plusmn; 19.33 mm) (P = .011). In the LRN group there was less blood loss, a lower transfusion rate, earlier ambulation, more rapid convalescence and shorter hospitalization; however, the difference in surgical duration between the ORN group (122.86 & plusmn; 36.8 min) and LRN group (140.17 & plusmn; 50.71 min) was not significant (P = .383). Analgesic requirement and VAS pain scores were similar in both groups. In terms of SF-36 physical domain scores, the general health perception score in the LRN group was higher than that in the ORN group at pre-surgery, 1 and 6 months after surgery. SF-36 physical functioning and general health perception scores in both groups were significantly lower in 1 month after surgery and were higher in 6 months after surgery, as compare to before surgery. Bodily pain scores in LRN group did not change significantly after surgery (P = .376).

CONCLUSION:

LRN exhibited some technical advantages, including less blood loss, shorter hospitalization and more rapid recovery. Although the ORN patients had relatively larger tumors, analgesic requirement, postoperative complications, body pain, and physical functioning weren't significantly different between the groups. QoL was higher 6 months after surgery than before surgery in both groups. & nbsp;

PMID:
25433472
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Urology and Nephrology Research Center
Loading ...
Support Center