Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Lupus Sci Med. 2014 Oct 1;1(1):e000056. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2014-000056. eCollection 2014.

Cell-bound complement activation products in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison with anti-double-stranded DNA and standard complement measurements.

Author information

1
Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center , Bronx, New York , USA.
2
Hofstra North Shore-Long Island Jewish School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois , USA.
3
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois , USA.
4
NYU School of Medicine , New York, New York , USA.
5
UCSD School of Medicine , La Jolla, California , USA.
6
UAB School of Medicine Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama , USA.
7
Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts , USA.
8
Hospital for Special Surgery , New York, New York , USA.
9
Washington Hospital Center , Washington, DC , USA.
10
San Diego Arthritis Research Clinic , San Diego, California , USA.
11
Allegheny Health System , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania , USA.
12
Exagen Diagnostics , Vista, California , USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the performance characteristics of cell-bound complement (C4d) activation products (CBCAPS) on erythrocyte (EC4d) and B cells (BC4d) with antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and complement C3 and C4 in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS:

The study enrolled 794 subjects consisting of 304 SLE and a control group consisting of 285 patients with other rheumatic diseases and 205 normal individuals. Anti-dsDNA and other autoantibodies were measured using solid-phase immunoassays while EC4d and BC4d were determined using flow cytometry. Complement proteins were determined using immunoturbidimetry. Disease activity in SLE was determined using a non-serological Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index SELENA Modification. A two-tiered methodology combining CBCAPS with autoantibodies to cellular and citrullinated antigens was also developed. Statistical analyses used area under receiver operating characteristic curves and calculations of area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS:

AUC for EC4d (0.82±0.02) and BC4d (0.84±0.02) was higher than those yielded by C3 (0.73±0.02) and C4 (0.72±0.02) (p<0.01). AUC for CBCAPS was also higher than the AUC yielded by anti-dsDNA (0.79±0.02), but significance was only achieved for BC4d (p<0.01). The combination of EC4d and BC4d in multivariate testing methodology with anti-dsDNA and autoantibodies to cellular and citrullinated antigens yielded 80% sensitivity for SLE and specificity ranging from 70% (Sjogren's syndrome) to 92% (rheumatoid arthritis) (98% vs. normal). A higher proportion of patients with SLE with higher levels of disease activity tested positive for elevated CBCAPS, reduced complement and anti-dsDNA (p<0.03).

CONCLUSIONS:

CBCAPS have higher sensitivity than standard complement and anti-dsDNA measurements, and may help with the differential diagnosis of SLE in combination with other autoantibodies.

KEYWORDS:

Autoantibodies; Autoimmune Diseases; Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center