Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;12(5):447-55. doi: 10.1370/afm.1688.

The 5 R's: an emerging bold standard for conducting relevant research in a changing world.

Author information

1
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota cjpeek@umn.edu.
2
Department of Family Medicine and Colorado Health Outcomes Program, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
3
Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Department of Sociology, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinical & Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
4
School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
5
Clinical Research Directorate/CMRP, SAIC-Frederick, Inc, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
6
Department of Family Medicine and the Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.

Abstract

Research often fails to find its way into practice or policy in a timely way, if at all. Given the current pressure and pace of health care change, many authors have recommended different approaches to make health care research more relevant and rapid. An emerging standard for research, the "5 R's" is a synthesis of recommendations for care delivery research that (1) is relevant to stakeholders; (2) is rapid and recursive in application; (3) redefines rigor; (4) reports on resources required; and (5) is replicable. Relevance flows from substantive ongoing participation by stakeholders. Rapidity and recursiveness occur through accelerated design and peer reviews followed by short learning/implementation cycles through which questions and answers evolve over time. Rigor is the disciplined conduct of shared learning within the specific changing situations in diverse settings. Resource reporting includes costs of interventions. Replicability involves designing for the factors that may affect subsequent implementation of an intervention or program in different contexts. These R's of the research process are mutually reinforcing and can be supported by training that fosters collaborative and reciprocal relationships among researchers, implementers, and other stakeholders. In sum, a standard is emerging for research that is both rigorous and relevant. Consistent and bold application will increase the value, timeliness, and applicability of the research enterprise.

KEYWORDS:

evaluation research; healthcare research; partnership research; rapid research; research design

PMID:
25354409
PMCID:
PMC4157982
DOI:
10.1370/afm.1688
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center