Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 24;9(10):e110790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110790. eCollection 2014.

Acid suppression therapy does not predispose to Clostridium difficile infection: the case of the potential bias.

Author information

1
Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
2
Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
3
The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
4
Infectious Diseases Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
5
Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
6
The Celiac Center at BIDMC, Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

An adverse effect of acid-suppression medications on the occurrence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been a common finding of many, but not all studies. We hypothesized that association between acid-suppression medications and CDI is due to the residual confounding in comparison between patients with infection to those without, predominantly from non-tested and less sick subjects. We aimed to evaluate the effect of acid suppression therapy on incidence of CDI by comparing patients with CDI to two control groups: not tested patients and patients suspected of having CDI, but with a negative test.

METHODS:

We conducted a case-control study of adult patients hospitalized in internal medicine department of tertiary teaching hospital between 2005-2010 for at least three days. Controls from each of two groups (negative for CDI and non-tested) were individually matched (1:1) to cases by primary diagnosis, Charlson comorbidity index, year of hospitalization and gender. Primary outcomes were diagnoses of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9)-coded CDI occurring 72 hours or more after admission.

RESULTS:

Patients with CDI were similar to controls with a negative test, while controls without CDI testing had lower clinical severity. In multivariable analysis, treatment by acid suppression medications was associated with CDI compared to those who were not tested (OR = 1.88, p-value = 0.032). Conversely, use of acid suppression medications in those who tested negative for the infection was not associated with CDI risk as compared to the cases (OR = 0.66; p = 0.059).

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings suggest that the reported epidemiologic associations between use of acid suppression medications and CDI risk may be spurious. The control group choice has an important impact on the results. Clinical differences between the patients with CDI and those not tested and not suspected of having the infection may explain the different conclusions regarding the acid suppression effect on CDI risk.

PMID:
25343667
PMCID:
PMC4208782
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0110790
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center