Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Feb 1;60(3):398-404. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu831. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

Evidence for increased Chlamydia case finding after the introduction of rectal screening among women attending 2 Canadian sexually transmitted infection clinics.

Author information

1
Sexually Transmitted Infection Centralized Services.
2
Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton University of Alberta.
3
Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton.
4
Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic, Alberta Health Services, Calgary.
5
Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa.
6
University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
7
University of Alberta Surveillance and Assessment, Alberta Health, Edmonton.
8
Provincial Laboratory for Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common notifiable disease in Canada, and extragenital sites are believed to serve as hidden reservoirs for ongoing transmission of infection. There are no specific Canadian screening guidelines for asymptomatic individuals from extragenital sites. We sought to determine the prevalence and factors associated with rectal C. trachomatis among female sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic attendees in Alberta, Canada.

METHODS:

Between 20 July and 31 December 2012, all female attendees at 2 Provincial STI clinics receiving a pelvic examination, regardless of a history of anal intercourse, were screened for rectal C. trachomatis using the Gen-Probe Aptima COMBO 2 Assay. Demographic and behavior variables were compared between rectal-only chlamydia cases and genitourinary cases using χ(2) or Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney test, and logistic regression.

RESULTS:

A total of 3055 women were screened for rectal chlamydia. The prevalence of rectal chlamydia ranged from 11.7% to 13.5%. There were 133 rectal-only cases, increasing case detection by 44.3% from 300 genitourinary cases to 433 total cases, ranging from 21.7% to 88.2% by clinic. Women who were a contact to an STI were less likely to have rectal-only chlamydia for both clinics (P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings add to the growing body of evidence supporting universal rectal screening in high-risk women such as those undergoing pelvic exams at STI clinics.

KEYWORDS:

STI clinic; chlamydia; females; rectum

PMID:
25336625
DOI:
10.1093/cid/ciu831
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center