Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Mar;65(3):443-50. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

Understanding by older patients of dialysis and conservative management for chronic kidney failure.

Author information

1
Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. Electronic address: sktc1o07@soton.ac.uk.
2
Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
3
Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
4
Renal Unit, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
5
Renal Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
6
Department of Renal Medicine, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Older adults with chronic kidney disease stage 5 may be offered a choice between dialysis and conservative management. Few studies have explored patients' reasons for choosing conservative management and none have compared the views of those who have chosen different treatments across renal units.

STUDY DESIGN:

Qualitative study with semistructured interviews.

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS:

Patients 75 years or older recruited from 9 renal units. Units were chosen to reflect variation in the scale of delivery of conservative management.

METHODOLOGY:

Semistructured interviews audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH:

Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS:

42 interviews were completed, 4 to 6 per renal unit. Patients were sampled from those receiving dialysis, those preparing for dialysis, and those choosing conservative management. 14 patients in each group were interviewed. Patients who had chosen different treatments held varying beliefs about what dialysis could offer. The information that patients reported receiving from clinical staff differed between units. Patients from units with a more established conservative management pathway were more aware of conservative management, less often believed that dialysis would guarantee longevity, and more often had discussed the future with staff. Some patients receiving conservative management reported that they would have dialysis if they became unwell in the future, indicating the conditional nature of their decision.

LIMITATIONS:

Recruitment of older adults with frailty and comorbid conditions was difficult and therefore transferability of findings to this population is limited.

CONCLUSIONS:

Older adults with chronic kidney disease stage 5 who have chosen different treatment options have contrasting beliefs about the likely outcomes of dialysis for those who are influenced by information provided by renal units. Supporting renal staff in discussing conservative management as a valid alternative to dialysis for a subset of patients will aid informed decision making. There is a need for better evidence about conservative management to support shared decision making for older people with chronic kidney failure.

KEYWORDS:

Chronic kidney disease; advanced care planning; conservative care; conservative management; decision making; dialysis; end-of-life care; end-stage renal disease (ESRD); geriatric; older adults; qualitative; renal replacement therapy (RRT); supportive care

PMID:
25304984
PMCID:
PMC4339698
DOI:
10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.08.011
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center