Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Oct;99(10):3489-510. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2260.

Androgen therapy in women: a reappraisal: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline.

Author information

Department of Medicine (M.E.W.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045; Veterans Affairs Research Service (M.E.W.), Denver, Colorado 80220; Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism (W.A.), School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry and OBGYN (R.B.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; Vancouver General Hospital (R.B.), Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; Women's Health Research Program (S.R.D.), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; Neuroendocrine Unit (K.K.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114; Mayo Clinic (M.H.M.), Rochester, Minnesota 55905; Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons (W.R.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York, New York 10032; and University of Colorado School of Medicine (N.S.), Aurora, Colorado 80045.



To update practice guidelines for the therapeutic use of androgens in women.


A Task Force appointed by the Endocrine Society, American Congress of Obestricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), European Society of Endocrinology (ESE), and International Menopause Society (IMS) consisting of six experts, a methodologist, and a medical writer.


The Task Force commissioned two systematic reviews of published data and considered several other existing meta-analyses and trials. The GRADE methodology was used; the strength of a recommendation is indicated by a number "1" (strong recommendation, we recommend) or "2" (weak recommendation, we suggest).


Multiple e-mail communications and conference calls determined consensus. Committees of the Endocrine Society, ASRM, ACOG, ESE, and IMS reviewed and commented on the drafts of the guidelines.


We continue to recommend against making a diagnosis of androgen deficiency syndrome in healthy women because there is a lack of a well-defined syndrome, and data correlating androgen levels with specific signs or symptoms are unavailable. We recommend against the general use of T for the following indications: infertility; sexual dysfunction other than hypoactive sexual desire disorder; cognitive, cardiovascular, metabolic, or bone health; or general well-being. We recommend against the routine use of dehydroepiandrosterone due to limited data concerning its effectiveness and safety in normal women or those with adrenal insufficiency. We recommend against the routine prescription of T or dehydroepiandrosterone for the treatment of women with low androgen levels due to hypopituitarism, adrenal insufficiency, surgical menopause, pharmacological glucocorticoid administration, or other conditions associated with low androgen levels because there are limited data supporting improvement in signs and symptoms with therapy and no long-term studies of risk. Evidence supports the short-term efficacy and safety of high physiological doses of T treatment of postmenopausal women with sexual dysfunction due to hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Importantly, endogenous T levels did not predict response to therapy. At present, physiological T preparations for use in women are not available in many countries including the United States, and long-term safety data are lacking. We recommend that any woman receiving T therapy be monitored for signs and symptoms of androgen excess. We outline areas for future research. Ongoing improvement in androgen assays will allow a redefinition of normal ranges across the lifespan; this may help to clarify the impact of varying concentrations of plasma androgens on the biology, physiology, and psychology in women and lead to indications for therapeutic interventions.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center