Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Hyperthermia. 2014 Sep;30(6):372-84. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2014.949878.

Radiofrequency cardiac ablation with catheters placed on opposing sides of the ventricular wall: computer modelling comparing bipolar and unipolar modes.

Author information

1
Biomedical Synergy, Electronic Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de València , Spain .

Abstract

PURPOSE:

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of bipolar (BM) vs. unipolar (UM) mode of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in terms of creating transmural lesions across the interventricular septum (IVS) and ventricular free wall (VFW).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We built computational models to study the temperature distributions and lesion dimensions created by BM and UM on IVS and VFW during RFA. Two different UM types were considered: sequential (SeUM) and simultaneous (SiUM). The effect of ventricular wall thickness, catheter misalignment, epicardial fat, and presence of air in the epicardial space were also studied.

RESULTS:

Regarding IVS ablation, BM created transmural and symmetrical lesions for wall thicknesses up to 15 mm. SeUM and SiUM were not able to create transmural lesions with IVS thicknesses ≥12.5 and 15 mm, respectively. Lesions were asymmetrical only with SeUM. For VFW ablation, BM also created transmural lesions for wall thicknesses up to 15 mm. However, with SeUM and SiUM transmurality was obtained for VFW thicknesses ≤7.5 and 12.5 mm, respectively. With the three modes, VFW lesions were always asymmetrical. In the scenario with air or a fat tissue layer on the epicardial side, only SiUM was capable of creating transmural lesions. Overall, BM was superior to UM in IVS and VFW ablation when the catheters were not aligned.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings suggest that BM is more effective than UM in achieving transmurality across both ventricular sites, except in the situation of the epicardial catheter tip surrounded by air or placed over a fat tissue layer.

KEYWORDS:

Bipolar ablation; interventricular septum; radiofrequency ablation; unipolar ablation; ventricular ablation; ventricular free wall

PMID:
25256891
DOI:
10.3109/02656736.2014.949878
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Taylor & Francis
Loading ...
Support Center