Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Dec;22(12):2524-31. doi: 10.1002/oby.20909. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

Meal timing during alternate day fasting: Impact on body weight and cardiovascular disease risk in obese adults.

Author information

1
Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Erratum in

  • Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Apr;23(4):914.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Alternate day fasting (ADF; 24-h feeding/24-h 25% energy intake at lunchtime), is effective for weight loss, but diet tolerability is questionable. Moving the fast day meal to dinnertime, or dividing it into smaller meals, may improve tolerability. Accordingly, this study compared the effects of ADF with three meal times on body weight and heart disease risk.

METHODS:

Obese subjects (n = 74) were randomized to 1 of 3 groups for 8 weeks: 1) ADF-L: lunch, 2) ADF-D: dinner, or 3) ADF-SM: small meals.

RESULTS:

Body weight decreased similarly (P < 0.001) in all groups (ADF-L: 3.5 ± 0.4 kg, ADF-D 4.1 ± 0.5 kg, ADF-SM 4.0 ± 0.5 kg). Reductions (P < 0.001) in fat mass and visceral fat were also comparable. Plasma lipids remained unchanged, and low density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size increased (P < 0.05) in all groups (1.3 ± 0.5 Å). Systolic blood pressure decreased (P < 0.05) by ADF-SM only. Fasting glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS:

Thus, allowing individuals to consume the fast day meal at dinner or small meals produces similar weight loss and cardio-protection as consuming the meal at lunch. This flexibility in meal timing may increase tolerability and long-term adherence to ADF protocols.

PMID:
25251676
DOI:
10.1002/oby.20909
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center