Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Sep;10(5):e321-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001473.

Bending the cost curve: a unique collaboration between radiation oncologists and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts to optimize the use of advanced technology.

Author information

1
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School; Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Center; Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Baystate Medical Center, Springfield; St Vincent Hospital; University of Massachusetts Medical Center and University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester; Shields Health Care Group, Quincy; and Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA.
2
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School; Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Center; Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Baystate Medical Center, Springfield; St Vincent Hospital; University of Massachusetts Medical Center and University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester; Shields Health Care Group, Quincy; and Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA Thomas.Fitzgerald@umassmed.edu.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) limits the dose of radiation to critical normal tissue structures and can be applied to the management of most cancers treated with radiation therapy. Because of increased treatment planning time and quality assurance, IMRT is costly. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA) and the Massachusetts Radiation Oncology Physicians Advisory Council (PAC) developed a strategy to develop standards for the appropriate use of IMRT.

METHODS:

Normal tissue volume guidelines were established in multiple oncology disease areas and body site regions. Guidelines were activated in September 2011, and the use of IMRT per case was tracked quarterly by BCBSMA staff.

RESULTS:

During the first year of activation of the volume-based guidelines, use of IMRT decreased by 17% in Massachusetts, in contrast to a 20% increase during the previous year.

CONCLUSIONS:

The normal tissue-based guidelines have decreased the use of IMRT in Massachusetts; increased the use of 3D treatment; continued communication between treating radiation oncologists and an insurance organization responsible for cost and quality in medicine; increased cost savings; enabled an efficient appeal process; and provided optimal, cost-effective patient care. This may prove to be an effective model for other disciplines and other developing and maturing radiation technologies.

PMID:
25232190
DOI:
10.1200/JOP.2014.001473
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center