Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Oct;107(10):529-39. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular systolic function in a population of unselected patients before cardiac surgery: a multiparametric approach is necessary.

Author information

1
Echocardiography laboratory, clinique Saint-Augustin, 114, avenue d'Arès, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
2
Department of cardiology, clinique Les Fleurs, 83190 Ollioules, France.
3
Echocardiography laboratory, clinique Saint-Augustin, 114, avenue d'Arès, 33000 Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: abergel.eric@gmail.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

According to recent USA guidelines, right ventricular (RV) dysfunction can be diagnosed on the basis of a single parameter, such as tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity (S')<10 cm/s or RV fractional area change (RVFAC)<35%.

AIMS:

To assess these recommendations in a large unselected cohort of patients awaiting cardiac surgery and evaluate less validated RV function criteria.

METHODS:

Among the consecutive patients, 413 were prospectively enrolled and underwent comprehensive echocardiography, including S', RVFAC and other RV parameters (right myocardial performance index; acceleration time, isovolumic velocity and isovolumic acceleration [IVA]; RV dP/dt; isovolumic relaxation time; two-dimensional [2D] strain). We defined subgroups of highly probable RV dysfunction (S'<10 cm/s and RVFAC<35%) and highly probable normal RV function (S'≥10 cm/s and RVFAC≥35%) as reference groups. Indices of preload and afterload were also recorded.

RESULTS:

Of 413 patients, 320 (77.5%) had normal RV function. In 93 patients, S' and/or RVFAC were abnormal; both were abnormal in 39 (42%) patients. Using our reference groups, IVA≤1.8 m/s2 and basal 2D strain≥-17% were of most value in diagnosing RV dysfunction. IVA was least load dependent while basal 2D strain appeared to be afterload and preload dependent.

CONCLUSION:

In this large population, S' and RVFAC were sometimes discrepant, supporting the need for a multiparametric approach when evaluating RV function. Among seven less validated criteria, IVA and 2D strain had the best diagnostic value. Unlike 2D strain, IVA was not influenced by loading conditions.

KEYWORDS:

2D strain; Accélération de la contraction isovolumique; Fonction ventriculaire droite; Fraction de raccourcissement de surface du ventricule droit; Indice de Tei; Isovolumic acceleration; Right myocardial performance index; Right ventricle fractional area change; Right ventricular function

PMID:
25218010
DOI:
10.1016/j.acvd.2014.06.007
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center