Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Spine J. 2015 Jan 1;15(1):162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.08.442. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

Cervical total disc replacement exhibits similar stiffness to intact cervical functional spinal units tested on a dynamic pendulum testing system.

Author information

1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy St, Providence, RI 02906, USA. Electronic address: sesmende@gmail.com.
2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy St, Providence, RI 02906, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT:

The pendulum testing system is capable of applying physiologic compressive loads without constraining the motion of functional spinal units (FSUs). The number of cycles to equilibrium observed under pendulum testing is a measure of the energy absorbed by the FSU.

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the dynamic bending stiffness and energy absorption of the cervical spine, with and without implanted cervical total disc replacement (TDR) under simulated physiologic motion.

STUDY DESIGN:

A biomechanical cadaver investigation.

METHODS:

Nine unembalmed, frozen human cervical FSUs from levels C3-C4 and C5-C6 were tested on the pendulum system with axial compressive loads of 25, 50, and 100 N before and after TDR implantation. Testing in flexion, extension, and lateral bending began by rotating the pendulum to 5°, resulting in unconstrained oscillatory motion. The number of rotations to equilibrium was recorded and the bending stiffness (Newton-meter/°) was calculated and compared for each testing mode.

RESULTS:

In flexion/extension, with increasing compressive loading from 25 to 100 N, the average number of cycles to equilibrium for the intact FSUs increased from 6.6 to 19.1, compared with 4.1 to 12.7 after TDR implantation (p<.05 for loads of 50 and 100 N). In flexion, with increasing compressive loading from 25 to 100 N, the bending stiffness of the intact FSUs increased from 0.27 to 0.59 Nm/°, compared with 0.21 to 0.57 Nm/° after TDR implantation. No significant differences were found in stiffness between the intact FSU and the TDR in flexion/extension and lateral bending at any load (p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Cervical FSUs with implanted TDR were found to have similar stiffness, but had greater energy absorption than intact FSUs during cyclic loading with an unconstrained pendulum system. These results provide further insight into the biomechanical behavior of cervical TDR under approximated physiologic loading conditions.

KEYWORDS:

Biomechanics; Cervical radiculopathy; Functional spinal unit; Motion preservation technology; Pendulum testing system; Total disc replacement

PMID:
25194516
DOI:
10.1016/j.spinee.2014.08.442
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center