Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Pain. 2014 Nov;15(11):1148-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 29.

Barriers to guideline-concordant opioid management in primary care--a qualitative study.

Author information

1
Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: erin.krebs@va.gov.
2
Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles System, Los Angeles, California.
3
Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
4
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
5
Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana.
6
Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana; Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Abstract

Prior studies have demonstrated poor physician adherence to opioid management guidelines in primary care. The objectives of this qualitative study were to understand physicians' and patients' perspectives on recommended opioid management practices and to identify potential barriers to and facilitators of guideline-concordant opioid management in primary care. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 primary care physicians and 26 of their patients receiving long-term opioid therapy. Data were analyzed using a qualitative immersion/crystallization approach. We identified 3 major barriers to and 1 facilitator of use of recommended opioid management practices. Major barriers were inadequate time and resources available; relying on general impressions of risk for opioid misuse; and viewing opioid monitoring as a "law enforcement" activity. The third barrier was most apparent for physicians in the context of drug testing and for patients in the context of opioid agreements. Beliefs about the need to protect patients from opioid-related harm emerged as a major facilitator, especially among patients. We hypothesize that future interventions to improve opioid management in primary care will be more effective if they address identified barriers and use a patient-centered framework, in which prevention of opioid-related harm to patients is emphasized as the primary goal.

PERSPECTIVE:

This article describes primary care perspectives on guideline-recommended opioid management practices. Barriers identified in this study may contribute to underuse of recommended opioid management practices. Consideration of barriers and facilitators to guideline-concordant care could improve effectiveness of future interventions aimed at improving opioid management in primary care.

KEYWORDS:

Chronic pain; guidelines; opioid analgesics; primary care; qualitative research

PMID:
25179150
DOI:
10.1016/j.jpain.2014.08.006
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center