Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Mar-Apr;54(2):207-13. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Aug 16.

Validating a new computed tomography atlas for grading ankle osteoarthritis.

Author information

1
Chief, Division of Podiatric Surgery, Surgical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL.
2
Private Practice, South Florida Institute of Sports Medicine, Pembroke Pines, FL.
3
Research Fellow, Division of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL. Electronic address: Jason.Levine2@va.gov.
4
Biostatistician, Rockville, MD.

Abstract

As the most common joint disease, osteoarthritis (OA) poses a significant source of pain and disability. It can be defined by classic radiographic findings, particular symptoms, or a combination of the 2. Although specific grading scales have been developed to evaluate OA in various joints, such as the shoulder, hip, and knee, no definitive classification system is available for grading OA in the ankle. The purpose of the present study was to create and validate a standardized atlas for grading (or staging) ankle osteoarthritis using computed tomography (CT) and "hallmark" findings noted on coronal, sagittal, and axial views extrapolated from the Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic scale. The CT scans of 226 patients at the Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center were reviewed. An atlas was derived from a retrospective review of 30 remaining CT scans taken from July 2008 to November 2011. After this review, 3 orthogonal static CT images, obtained from 11 remaining patients, were chosen to represent the various stages on the OA scale and were used to test the validity of the atlas developed by 2 of us (M.M.C. and N.D.V.). A multispecialty panel of 9 examiners, excluding ourselves, independently rated the 11 CT scan subjects. The differences among examiners and specialties were calculated, including an intra-examiner agreement for 2 separate readings spaced 9 months apart. Although the small number of subspecialty examiners made the intraspecialty comparisons difficult to validate, the findings nevertheless indicated excellent agreement among all specialty groups, with good intra-investigational (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.962 and 1) inter-investigational (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.851) values. These results appeared to validate the CT ankle OA atlas, which we believe will be a valuable clinical and research tool, one that will likely be more beneficial than less relevant generalized OA grading scales in use today.

KEYWORDS:

ankle; atlas; computed tomography; grading scale; osteoarthritis

PMID:
25135101
DOI:
10.1053/j.jfas.2014.06.017
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center