Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Dec;11(12):2156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.08.023. Epub 2014 Aug 15.

Prospective long-term evaluation of Optim-insulated (Riata ST Optim and Durata) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.

Author information

1
Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: john.cairns@ubc.ca.
2
Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
3
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
4
Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
5
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
6
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

St Jude Medical Optim-insulated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads were designed to impart lubricity, strength, and abrasion resistance while maintaining flexibility and biostability. No long-term prospective follow-up data have been published.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to determine the rates of all-cause mechanical failure and its subtypes (conductor fracture, insulation abrasion, externalized conductors, and other mechanical failures) in a prospective cohort of Optim-insulated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.

METHODS:

St Jude Medical established 3 prospective registries and enrolled 11,016 leads implanted in 10,835 patients beginning in 2006. There was standardized baseline documentation, 6-monthly follow-up, adverse events reports (verified by expert staff using detailed algorithms), and documentation of lead revisions or inactivation, study withdrawal, and death. The Population Health Research Institute (McMaster University) was engaged to review database functions, adjudicate all potential mechanical lead failures, and conduct independent analyses of the data.

RESULTS:

During a median follow-up of 3.2 years, there were 51 mechanical failures (0.46%), with 99.0% survival free of this outcome by 5 years of follow-up. Freedom from conductor fracture was identified in 99.4% and from all-cause abrasion in 99.8% of the leads, and there were no reports of externalized conductors. There were no significant differences in survival among Durata DF4, Durata DF1, and Riata ST Optim leads.

CONCLUSION:

Over a mean follow-up of 3.2 years, Optim-insulated leads have low rates of all-cause mechanical failure and no observed externalized conductors. Independent analyses of these registries are designed to provide reliable long-term follow-up information and are ongoing.

KEYWORDS:

ICD leads; Mechanical lead failure; Optim insulation; Prospective cohort study; Prospective registries

PMID:
25131665
DOI:
10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.08.023
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center