Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Virol. 2014 Oct;88(20):11713-25. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01707-14. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

Probing the functions of the paramyxovirus glycoproteins F and HN with a panel of synthetic antibodies.

Author information

1
Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
2
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
3
Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
4
Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
5
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA koss@bsd.uchicago.edu ralamb@northwestern.edu.
6
Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA koss@bsd.uchicago.edu ralamb@northwestern.edu.

Abstract

Paramyxoviruses are enveloped negative-strand RNA viruses that are significant human and animal pathogens. Most paramyxoviruses infect host cells via the concerted action of a tetrameric attachment protein (variously called HN, H, or G) that binds either sialic acid or protein receptors on target cells and a trimeric fusion protein (F) that merges the viral envelope with the plasma membrane at neutral pH. F initially folds to a metastable prefusion conformation that becomes activated via a cleavage event during cellular trafficking. Upon receptor binding, the attachment protein, which consists of a globular head anchored to the membrane via a helical tetrameric stalk, triggers a major conformation change in F which results in fusion of virus and host cell membranes. We recently proposed a model for F activation in which the attachment protein head domains move following receptor binding to expose HN stalk residues critical for triggering F. To test the model in the context of wild-type viral glycoproteins, we used a restricted-diversity combinatorial Fab library and phage display to rapidly generate synthetic antibodies (sAbs) against multiple domains of the paramyxovirus parainfluenza 5 (PIV5) pre- and postfusion F and HN. As predicted by the model, sAbs that bind to the critical F-triggering region of the HN stalk do not disrupt receptor binding or neuraminidase (NA) activity but are potent inhibitors of fusion. An inhibitory prefusion F-specific sAb recognized a quaternary antigenic site and may inhibit fusion by preventing F refolding or by blocking the F-HN interaction. Importance: The paramyxovirus family of negative-strand RNA viruses cause significant disease in humans and animals. The viruses bind to cells via their receptor binding protein and then enter cells by fusion of their envelope with the host cell plasma membrane, a process mediated by a metastable viral fusion (F) protein. To understand the steps in viral membrane fusion, a library of synthetic antibodies to F protein and the receptor binding protein was generated in bacteriophage. These antibodies bound to different regions of the F protein and the receptor binding protein, and the location of antibody binding affected different processes in viral entry into cells.

PMID:
25122782
PMCID:
PMC4178754
DOI:
10.1128/JVI.01707-14
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center