Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Biomech. 2014 Sep 22;47(12):2969-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 15.

Empirical evaluation of gastrocnemius and soleus function during walking.

Author information

1
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
2
Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
3
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: thelen@engr.wisc.edu.

Abstract

Distinguishing gastrocnemius and soleus muscle function is relevant for treating gait disorders in which abnormal plantarflexor activity may contribute to pathological movement patterns. Our objective was to use experimental and computational analysis to determine the influence of gastrocnemius and soleus activity on lower limb movement, and determine if anatomical variability of the gastrocnemius affected its function. Our hypothesis was that these muscles exhibit distinct functions, with the gastrocnemius inducing limb flexion and the soleus inducing limb extension. To test this hypothesis, the gastrocnemius or soleus of 20 healthy participants was electrically stimulated for brief periods (90 ms) during mid- or terminal stance of a random gait cycle. Muscle function was characterized by the induced change in sagittal pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle angles occurring during the 200 ms after stimulation onset. Results were corroborated with computational forward dynamic gait models, by perturbing gastrocnemius or soleus activity during similar portions of the gait cycle. Mid- and terminal stance gastrocnemius stimulation induced posterior pelvic tilt, hip flexion and knee flexion. Mid-stance gastrocnemius stimulation also induced ankle dorsiflexion. In contrast mid-stance soleus stimulation induced anterior pelvic tilt, knee extension and plantarflexion, while late-stance soleus stimulation induced relatively little change in motion. Model predictions of induced hip, knee, and ankle motion were generally in the same direction as those of the experiments, though the gastrocnemius's results were shown to be quite sensitive to its knee-to-ankle moment arm ratio.

KEYWORDS:

Biarticular muscle; Dynamic muscle function; Electrical stimulation; Forward dynamics; Induced motion

PMID:
25107666
PMCID:
PMC4228932
DOI:
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.07.007
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center