Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Nov;73(11):1923-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205544. Epub 2014 Aug 4.

Greater body mass independently predicts less radiographic progression on X-ray and MRI over 1-2 years.

Author information

1
Division of Rheumatology, Philadelphia Veterans' Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
2
Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
3
Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
4
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
5
Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.
6
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Greater body mass index (BMI) has been associated with less radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We evaluated the association between BMI and joint damage progression as measured by X-ray and MRI.

METHODS:

1068 subjects with RA from two clinical trials of golimumab (GO-BEFORE and GO-FORWARD) had radiographs performed at weeks 0, 52 and 104 and evaluated using the van der Heijde-Sharp (vdHS) scoring system. Contrast-enhanced MRIs of the dominant wrist and hand were obtained at weeks 0, 12, 24, 52 and 104. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the risk of radiographic progression for each BMI category (<25, 25-30, >30 kg/m(2)). Within GO-BEFORE, piecewise, robust generalised estimating equations marginal models assessed the probability of MRI erosion progression for each BMI category. Multivariable linear regression models assessed baseline associations between BMI and bone oedema (a precursor of bone erosion).

RESULTS:

Higher BMI category was associated with a lower probability of progression in vdHS score at weeks 52 and 104 independent of potential confounders. Higher BMI was also independently associated with a lower probability of progression in MRI erosion score over 2 years. Subjects with greater BMI demonstrated less bone oedema independent of differences in other disease severity measures, including MRI synovitis in the same joints.

CONCLUSIONS:

Greater BMI is associated with a lower risk of progression on X-ray and MRI over 2 years. Subjects with greater BMI also demonstrate less bone oedema at baseline. Greater BMI may indicate a less aggressive RA phenotype and aid in risk stratification.

KEYWORDS:

Epidemiology; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Rheumatoid Arthritis

PMID:
25091439
PMCID:
PMC4809044
DOI:
10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205544
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center