Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 1;9(8):e103481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103481. eCollection 2014.

CT-angiography-based evaluation of the aortic annulus for prosthesis sizing in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)-predictive value and optimal thresholds for major anatomic parameters.

Author information

1
Institute for Clinical Radiology, Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
2
Medical Clinic I - Cardiology, Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
3
HELIOS Klinikum Siegburg, HELIOS Kliniken GmbH, Siegburg, Germany.
4
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
5
Institute for Clinical Radiology, Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
6
Medical Clinic I - Cardiology, Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the predictive value of CT-derived measurements of the aortic annulus for prosthesis sizing in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to calculate optimal cutoff values for the selection of various prosthesis sizes.

METHODS:

The local IRB waived approval for this single-center retrospective analysis. Of 441 consecutive TAVI-patients, 90 were excluded (death within 30 days: 13; more than mild aortic regurgitation: 10; other reasons: 67). In the remaining 351 patients, the CoreValve (Medtronic) and the Edwards Sapien XT valve (Edwards Lifesciences) were implanted in 235 and 116 patients. Optimal prosthesis size was determined during TAVI by inflation of a balloon catheter at the aortic annulus. All patients had undergone CT-angiography of the heart or body trunk prior to TAVI. Using these datasets, the diameter of the long and short axis as well as the circumference and the area of the aortic annulus were measured. Multi-Class Receiver-Operator-Curve analyses were used to determine the predictive value of all variables and to define optimal cutoff-values.

RESULTS:

Differences between patients who underwent implantation of the small, medium or large prosthesis were significant for all except the large vs. medium CoreValve (all p's<0.05). Furthermore, mean diameter, annulus area and circumference had equally high predictive value for prosthesis size for both manufacturers (multi-class AUC's: 0.80, 0.88, 0.91, 0.88, 0.88, 0.89). Using the calculated optimal cutoff-values, prosthesis size is predicted correctly in 85% of cases.

CONCLUSION:

CT-based aortic root measurements permit excellent prediction of the prosthesis size considered optimal during TAVI.

PMID:
25084451
PMCID:
PMC4118882
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0103481
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center