Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):587-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.041. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

Relation of systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures and aortic distensibility with atrial fibrillation (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).

Author information

1
Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
2
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
3
Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.
4
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
5
Epidemiological Cardiology Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
6
Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
7
Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: alonso@umn.edu.

Abstract

Previous research suggests that elevated pulse pressure (PP) is a risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) independently of mean arterial pressure (MAP). PP may serve as an indirect measure of aortic stiffness (reduced distensibility), but whether directly measured aortic distensibility is related to risk for AF has not yet been studied. This analysis included 6,630 participants aged 45 to 84 years from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. At baseline, blood pressure and other relevant covariates were measured using standardized protocols. Magnetic resonance imaging-based aortic distensibility was measured in 3,441 participants. Incident AF was identified from hospitalization discharge codes and Medicare claims. Multivariate Cox models were used to estimate the association of blood pressure components and aortic distensibility with AF risk. During a mean follow-up of 7.8 years, 307 AF events (137 among those with aortic distensibility measurements) were identified. In multivariate-adjusted models simultaneously including MAP and PP, each 1-SD increase in PP was associated with a 29% increased risk of AF (95% confidence interval 5% to 59%, p = 0.02), with MAP not being associated with increased AF risk. Overall, aortic distensibility was not consistently associated with AF risk: after removing outliers, each 1-SD increase in aortic distensibility was associated with a 9% increased risk of AF (95% confidence interval -22% to 51%, p = 0.63). In conclusion, in this large community-based cohort, we found that PP, but not MAP or aortic distensibility, was a significant risk factor for AF, emphasizing the importance of PP when assessing the risk for developing AF. Our results cast doubt on the clinical utility of aortic distensibility as a predictor for the development of AF.

PMID:
24996553
PMCID:
PMC4119835
DOI:
10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.041
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Publication types, MeSH terms, Grant support

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grant support

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center