Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;12(12):2015-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

Markers of eosinophilic inflammation for diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis and proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia: a prospective study.

Author information

1
Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: edellon@med.unc.edu.
2
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
3
Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
4
Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
5
Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS:

Distinguishing between eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), gastroesophageal reflux disease, and proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE) is challenging. We assessed whether immunohistochemical analysis of esophageal tissues for major basic protein (MBP), eotaxin-3, and tryptase can be used for diagnosis of EoE and to differentiate EoE from PPI-REE.

METHODS:

We conducted a prospective study of 196 consecutive adults who underwent outpatient endoscopy at the University of North Carolina from 2009 through 2012. Incident cases of EoE were diagnosed per consensus guidelines. Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease or dysphagia served as controls. PPI-REE was defined as a symptomatic and histologic response to a PPI. Immunohistochemistry was performed to quantify MBP, eotaxin-3, and tryptase. The maximum density of epithelial staining was determined for each assay; levels were compared between EoE and control groups and then EoE and PPI-REE groups, and receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed.

RESULTS:

Esophageal tissues from patients with EoE (n = 50) had a median 951 MBP-positive cells/mm(2), whereas those from controls (n = 123) had a median 2 MBP-positive cells/mm(2) (P < .001). Samples from patients with EoE had a median 155 eotaxin-3-positive cells/mm(2), and those from controls (n = 123) had 18 eotaxin-3-positive cells/mm(2) (P < .001). Samples from patients with EoE had a median 249 tryptase-positive cells/mm(2), and those from controls (n = 123) had 11 tryptase-positive cells/mm(2) (P < .001). Levels of MBP, eotaxin-3, tryptase, and the combination of all 3 identified patients with EoE with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.99, 0.94, 0.99, and 1.00. Analyses of only samples with eosinophil counts of 10-100 eosinophils per high-power field produced similar results. No marker distinguished EoE from PPI-REE. Esophageal tissues from patients with PPI-REE (n = 23) had 987 MBP-positive cells/mm(2) (P = .18, compared with EoE), 160 eotaxin-3-positive cells/mm(2) (P = .33), and 243 tryptase-positive cells/mm(2) (P = .28).

CONCLUSIONS:

Esophageal tissues from patients with EoE have substantially higher levels of MBP, eotaxin-3, and tryptase than controls on the basis of immunohistochemical analysis. Assays for the 3 markers identify patients with EoE with 100% accuracy but cannot distinguish EoE from PPI-REE.

KEYWORDS:

AUCROC; Diagnostic; GERD; Immunohistochemical Assay; Validation

PMID:
24993367
PMCID:
PMC4252508
DOI:
10.1016/j.cgh.2014.06.019
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center