Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug;109(8):1277-85. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.166. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

Eosinophilic gastritis in children: clinicopathological correlation, disease course, and response to therapy.

Author information

1
Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
2
Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
3
Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Center for Eosinophilic Disorders, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Eosinophilic gastritis (EG), defined by histological criteria as marked eosinophilia in the stomach, is rare, and large studies in children are lacking. We sought to describe the clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological features of EG, assess for any concurrent eosinophilia at other sites of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and evaluate response to dietary and pharmacological therapies.

METHODS:

Pathology files at our medical center were searched for histological eosinophilic gastritis (HEG) with ≥70 gastric eosinophils per high-power field in children from 2005 to 2011. Pathology slides were evaluated for concurrent eosinophilia in the esophagus, duodenum, and colon. Medical records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, symptoms, endoscopic findings, comorbidities, and response to therapy.

RESULTS:

Thirty children with severe gastric eosinophilia were identified, median age 7.5 years, 14 of whom had both eosinophilia limited to the stomach and clinical symptoms, fulfilling the clinicopathological definition of EG. Symptoms and endoscopic features were highly variable. History of atopy and food allergies was common. A total of 22% had protein-losing enteropathy (PLE). Gastric eosinophilia was limited to the fundus in two patients. Many patients had associated eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE, 43%) and 21% had eosinophilic enteritis. Response to dietary restriction therapy was high (82% clinical response and 78% histological response). Six out of sixteen patients had persistent EoE despite resolution of their gastric eosinophilia; two children with persistent HEG post therapy developed de novo concurrent EoE.

CONCLUSIONS:

HEG in children can be present in the antrum and/or fundus. Symptoms and endoscopic findings vary, highlighting the importance of biopsies for diagnosis. HEG is associated with PLE, and with eosinophilia elsewhere in the GI tract including the esophagus. The disease is highly responsive to dietary restriction therapies in children, implicating an allergic etiology. Associated EoE is more resistant to therapy.

PMID:
24957155
DOI:
10.1038/ajg.2014.166
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Nature Publishing Group
    Loading ...
    Support Center