Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Environ Manage. 2014 Nov 1;144:135-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.031. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

A comparative assessment of economic-incentive and command-and-control instruments for air pollution and CO2 control in China's iron and steel sector.

Author information

1
School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9EP, UK.
2
School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China. Electronic address: maoxq@bnu.edu.cn.
3
International Energy Agency, 9 rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France.
4
School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby B.C. V5A 1S6, Canada.

Abstract

China's iron and steel sector is faced with increasing pressure to control both local air pollutants and CO2 simultaneously. Additional policy instruments are needed to co-control these emissions in this sector. This study quantitatively evaluates and compares two categories of emission reduction instruments, namely the economic-incentive (EI) instrument of a carbon tax, and the command-and-control (CAC) instrument of mandatory application of end-of-pipe emission control measures for CO2, SO2 and NOx. The comparative evaluation tool is an integrated assessment model, which combines a top-down computable general equilibrium sub-model and a bottom-up technology-based sub-model through a soft-linkage. The simulation results indicate that the carbon tax can co-control multiple pollutants, but the emission reduction rates are limited under the tax rates examined in this study. In comparison, the CAC instruments are found to have excellent effects on controlling different pollutants separately, but not jointly. Such results indicate that no single EI or CAC instrument is overwhelmingly superior. The environmental and economic effectiveness of an instrument highly depends on its specific attributes, and cannot be predicted by the general policy category. These findings highlight the necessity of clearer identification of policy target priorities, and detail-oriented and integrated policy-making among different governmental departments.

KEYWORDS:

CO(2); China's iron and steel sector; Emission control instruments; Integrated assessment model; Local air pollutants

PMID:
24945700
DOI:
10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.031
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center