Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2014 Jul;12(7):606-14. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12362. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

To excise or not: impact of MelaFind on German dermatologists' decisions to biopsy atypical lesions.

Author information

1
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To determine the biopsy sensitivity to melanoma of dermatologists in Germany and the impact of MelaFindĀ® on their decisions to biopsy melanomas.

DESIGN:

Randomized two-armed online reader study presenting case information, clinical/dermatoscopic images of pigmented skin lesions and MelaFind results (Arm 2).

METHODS:

Each participant was asked to review 130 pigmented skin lesions. Biopsy decisions of dermatologists without MelaFind versus MelaFind and dermatologists without MelaFind versus dermatologists with MelaFind were compared.

RESULTS:

Dermatologists without MelaFind had average sensitivity to melanoma of 69.5 % and average specificity of 55.9 %. MelaFind had greater sensitivity than dermatologists alone (96.9 % vs. 69.5 %, one-sided p < 0.00001) and lower specificity (9.2 % vs. 55.9 %, one-sided p < 0.00001). Dermatologists with MelaFind had higher sensitivity than those without MelaFind (78 % vs. 69.5 %, one-sided p < 0.00001) and a lower specificity (45.8 % vs. 55.9 %, one-sided p < 0.00001). The number of dermatologists detecting over 90 % of melanomas increased from 3 of 101 without MelaFind to 22 of 101 with MelaFind (p = 0.00006) while specificity remained relatively equivalent (23 % vs. 21 %, p = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS:

The MelaFind information, when incorporated into the final biopsy decision, can improve biopsy sensitivity with modest effect on biopsy specificity.

PMID:
24944011
DOI:
10.1111/ddg.12362
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center