Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Stat Med. 2014 Oct 30;33(24):4215-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.6231. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

Analysis of secondary outcomes in nested case-control study designs.

Author information

1
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, 10461, U.S.A.

Abstract

One of the main perceived advantages of using a case-cohort design compared with a nested case-control design in an epidemiologic study is the ability to evaluate with the same subcohort outcomes other than the primary outcome of interest. In this paper, we show that valid inferences about secondary outcomes can also be achieved in nested case-control studies by using the inclusion probability weighting method in combination with an approximate jackknife standard error that can be computed using existing software. Simulation studies demonstrate that when the sample size is sufficient, this approach yields valid type 1 error and coverage rates for the analysis of secondary outcomes in nested case-control designs. Interestingly, the statistical power of the nested case-control design was comparable with that of the case-cohort design when the primary and secondary outcomes were positively correlated. The proposed method is illustrated with the data from a cohort in Cardiovascular Health Study to study the association of C-reactive protein levels and the incidence of congestive heart failure.

KEYWORDS:

incidence density sampling; nested case-control design; secondary outcomes

PMID:
24919979
PMCID:
PMC4184936
DOI:
10.1002/sim.6231
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center