Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Hypertens. 2015 Jan;28(1):42-9. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu099. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

Levels of office blood pressure and their operating characteristics for detecting masked hypertension based on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Author information

1
Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Hypertension Research Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; anthony_viera@med.unc.edu.
2
Hypertension Research Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;
3
Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Hypertension Research Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;
4
Department of Medicine, Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York;
5
Hypertension Research Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Masked hypertension (MH)--nonelevated office blood pressure (BP) with elevated out-of-office BP average--conveys cardiovascular risk similar to or approaching sustained hypertension, making its detection of potential clinical importance. However, it may not be feasible or cost-effective to perform ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) on all patients with a nonelevated office BP. There likely exists a level of office BP below which ABPM is not warranted because the probability of MH is low.

METHODS:

We analyzed data from 294 adults aged ≥ 30 years not on BP-lowering medication with office BP <140/90 mm Hg, all of whom underwent 24-hour ABPM. We calculated sensitivity, false-positive rate, and likelihood ratios (LRs) for the range of office BP cutoffs from 110 to 138 mm Hg systolic and from 68 to 88 mm Hg diastolic for detecting MH.

RESULTS:

The systolic BP cutoff with the highest +LR for detecting MH (1.8) was 120 mm Hg, and the diastolic cutoff with the highest +LR (2.4) was 82 mm Hg. However, the systolic level of 120 mm Hg had a false-positive rate of 42%, and the diastolic level of 82 mm Hg had a sensitivity of only 39%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The cutoff of office BP with the best overall operating characteristics for diagnosing MH is approximately 120/82 mm Hg. However, this cutoff may have an unacceptably high false-positive rate. Clinical risk tools to identify patients with nonelevated office BP for whom ABPM should be considered will likely need to include factors in addition to office BP.

KEYWORDS:

ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; blood pressure; diagnosis; hypertension; masked hypertension; screening.

PMID:
24898379
PMCID:
PMC4288122
DOI:
10.1093/ajh/hpu099
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center