Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Can J Cardiol. 2014 Jun;30(6):577-89. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.02.018. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement on the management of thoracic aortic disease.

Author information

1
Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: mboodhwani@ottawaheart.ca.
2
Department of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
3
Department of Radiology, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.
4
Division of Vascular Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
5
Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
6
Division of Cardiology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
7
Division of Cardiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

This Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement aims to provide succinct perspectives on key issues in the management of thoracic aortic disease (TAD). This document is not a comprehensive overview of TAD and important elements of the epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis, and management of acute aortic syndromes are deliberately not discussed; readers are referred to the 2010 guidelines published by the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, and other stakeholders. Rather, this document is a practical guide for clinicians managing adult patients with TAD. Topics covered include size thresholds for surgical intervention, emerging therapies, imaging modalities, medical and lifestyle management, and genetics of TAD. The primary panel consisted of experts from a variety of disciplines that are essential for comprehensive management of TAD patients. The methodology involved a focused literature review with an emphasis on updates since 2010 and the use of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to arrive at specific recommendations. The final document then underwent review by a secondary panel. This document aims to provide recommendations for most patients and situations. However, the ultimate judgement regarding the management of any individual patients should be made by their health care team.

PMID:
24882528
DOI:
10.1016/j.cjca.2014.02.018
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Publication types, MeSH terms, Substances

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center