Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jul;113:110-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.037. Epub 2014 May 6.

Are public-private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review.

Author information

1
School of Management, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK; Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, UK. Electronic address: j.roehrich@bath.ac.uk.
2
School of Management, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
3
Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, UK.

Abstract

Governments around the world, but especially in Europe, have increasingly used private sector involvement in developing, financing and providing public health infrastructure and service delivery through public-private partnerships (PPPs). Reasons for this uptake are manifold ranging from rising expenditures for refurbishing, maintaining and operating public assets, and increasing constraints on government budgets stifle, seeking innovation through private sector acumen and aiming for better risk management. Although PPPs have attracted practitioner and academic interest over the last two decades, there has been no attempt to integrate the general and health management literature to provide a holistic view of PPPs in healthcare delivery. This study analyzes over 1400 publications from a wide range of disciplines over a 20-year time period. We find that despite the scale and significance of the phenomenon, there is relatively limited conceptualization and in-depth empirical investigation. Based on bibliographic and content analyses, we synthesize formerly dispersed research perspectives into a comprehensive multi-dimensional framework of public-private partnerships. In so doing, we provide new directions for further research and practice.

KEYWORDS:

Bibliographic analysis; Content analysis; Health management; Management practice; Public and private actors; Public–private partnership; Systematic literature review

PMID:
24861412
DOI:
10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.037
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center