Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Aug;69(3):284-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 May 20.

Cannabis, pesticides and conflicting laws: the dilemma for legalized States and implications for public health.

Author information

1
Oregon State University, Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States. Electronic address: Dave.Stone@oregonstate.edu.

Abstract

State laws on the legalization of medical and recreational cannabis are rapidly evolving. Similar to other crops, cannabis is susceptible to multiple pests during cultivation. Growers have an economic incentive to produce large yields and high quality plants, and may resort to pesticides to achieve these outcomes. Currently, there are no pesticides registered for cannabis in the United States, given its illegal status by the federal government. This discrepancy creates a regulatory vacuum and dilemma for States with legal medical and recreational cannabis that seek to balance lawful compliance with pesticides and worker or public health. Pesticide use presents occupational safety issues that can be mitigated through established worker protection measures. The absence of approved products for cannabis may result in consumer exposures to otherwise more hazardous pesticides or higher residue levels. While many legal and scientific hurdles exist to register conventional pesticides for use on cannabis, legalized States have explored other opportunities to leverage the present regulatory infrastructure. Stakeholder engagement and outreach to the cannabis industry from credible sources could mitigate pesticide misuse and harm.

KEYWORDS:

Cannabis; Marijuana; Pesticides; Public health; Regulation; Risk

PMID:
24859075
DOI:
10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.05.015
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center