Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Sep;64(3):411-24. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 17.

Measuring GFR: a systematic review.

Author information

1
Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: inga.soveri@medsci.uu.se.
2
Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Pediatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
3
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
4
Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Renal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.
5
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
6
Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment, Stockholm, Sweden.
7
Department of Nephrology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Malmö, Sweden.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

No comprehensive systematic review of the accuracy of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement methods using renal inulin clearance as reference has been published.

STUDY DESIGN:

Systematic review with meta-analysis of cross-sectional diagnostic studies.

SETTING & POPULATION:

Published original studies and systematic reviews in any population.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES:

Index and reference measurements conducted within 48 hours; at least 15 participants studied; GFR markers measured in plasma or urine; plasma clearance calculation algorithm verified in another study; tubular secretion of creatinine had not been blocked by medicines.

INDEX TESTS:

Endogenous creatinine clearance; renal or plasma clearance of chromium 51-labeled ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (51Cr-EDTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), iohexol, and iothalamate; and plasma clearance of inulin.

REFERENCE TEST:

Renal inulin clearance measured under continuous inulin infusion and urine collection.

RESULTS:

Mean bias <10%, median bias <5%, the proportion of errors in the index measurements that did not exceed 30% (P30) ≥80%, and P10 ≥50% were set as requirements for sufficient accuracy. Based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach, the quality of evidence across studies was rated for each index method. Renal clearance of iothalamate measured GFR with sufficient accuracy (strong evidence). Renal and plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA and plasma clearance of iohexol were sufficiently accurate to measure GFR (moderately strong evidence). Renal clearance of DTPA, renal clearance of iohexol, and plasma clearance of inulin had sufficient accuracy (limited evidence). Endogenous creatinine clearance was an inaccurate method (strong evidence), as was plasma clearance of DTPA (limited evidence). The evidence to determine the accuracy of plasma iothalamate clearance was insufficient. With the exception of plasma clearance of inulin, only renal clearance methods had P30 >90%.

LIMITATIONS:

The included studies were few and most were old and small, which may limit generalizability. Requirements for sufficient accuracy may depend on clinical setting.

CONCLUSIONS:

At least moderately strong evidence suggests that renal clearance of 51Cr-EDTA or iothalamate and plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA or iohexol are sufficiently accurate methods to measure GFR.

KEYWORDS:

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR); accuracy; clearance marker; glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement; renal function

PMID:
24840668
DOI:
10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.010
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center