Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int Surg. 2014 May-Jun;99(3):216-22. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00268.1.

Comparison between transverse mini-incision and longitudinal mini-incision for the resection of locally advanced colonic cancer.

Author information

1
Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Japan.

Abstract

We performed a retrospective review of non-overweight (body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m(2)) patients scheduled to undergo a curative resection of locally advanced colon cancer via a transverse mini-incision (n = 62) or a longitudinal mini-incision (skin incision ≤7 cm, n = 62), with the latter group of patients randomly selected as historical controls matched with the former group according to tumor location. Extension of the transverse mini-incision wound was necessary in 3 patients (5%). Both groups were largely equivalent in terms of demographic, clinicopathological, and surgical factors and frequency of postoperative complications. Postoperative analgesic was significantly less (P = 0.04) and postoperative length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter (P < 0.01) in the transverse mini-incision group. Concerning a mini-incision approach for locally advanced colonic cancer, a transverse incision seems to be advantageous with regard to minimal invasiveness and early recovery compared with a longitudinal incision.

KEYWORDS:

Colectomy; Colonic cancer; Mini-laparotomy; Transverse incision

PMID:
24833142
PMCID:
PMC4027903
DOI:
10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00268.1
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Allen Press, Inc. Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center