Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Bipolar Disord. 2014 Aug;16(5):493-504. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12205. Epub 2014 May 5.

The predictive validity of bipolar at-risk (prodromal) criteria in help-seeking adolescents and young adults: a prospective study.

Author information

1
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Academic Hospital of Charite Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Orygen Youth Health Research Centre; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

There are no established tools to identify individuals at risk for developing bipolar disorder. We developed a set of ultra-high-risk criteria for bipolar disorder [bipolar at-risk (BAR)]. The primary aim of the present study was to determine the predictive validity of the BAR criteria.

METHODS:

This was a 12-month prospective study that was conducted at Orygen Youth Health Clinical Program, a public mental health program for young people aged 15-24 years in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. At intake, BAR screen-positive individuals and a matched group of individuals who did not meet BAR criteria were observed over a period of 12 months. The BAR criteria include general criteria such as being in the peak age range for the onset of the disorder, as well as sub-threshold mania, depression plus cyclothymic features, and depression plus genetic risk. Conversion to first-episode mania/hypomania was defined by the presence of DSM-IV manic symptoms for more than four days, in line with the DSM-IV definition of hypomania/mania.

RESULTS:

A total of 559 help-seeking patients were screened. Of the eligible participants, 59 (10.6%) met BAR criteria. Thirty-five participants were included in the BAR group and 35 matched participants were selected to be in the control group. During the follow-up, five BAR patients out of 35 (14.3%) converted to first-episode hypomania/mania as opposed to none in the non-BAR group [χ(2) (1) = 5.38, p = 0.020]. Four out of these five converters had a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar I or bipolar II disorder.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings support the possibility of identification of persons prior to the onset of mania/hypomania. The proposed criteria need further evaluation in larger, prospective studies with longer follow-up periods.

KEYWORDS:

bipolar disorder; cyclothymia; depression; follow-up; high-risk; mania; prodrome; prospective study

PMID:
24797824
DOI:
10.1111/bdi.12205
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center