Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Dec;48(6):1108-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 May 2.

Family involvement at the end-of-life and receipt of quality care.

Author information

1
San Francisco VA Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. Electronic address: rebecca.sudore@ucsf.edu.
2
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
4
School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Abstract

CONTEXT:

Most patients will lose decision-making capacity at the end of life. Little is known about the quality of care received by patients who have family involved in their care.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate differences in the receipt of quality end-of-life care for patients who died with and without family involvement.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 34,290 decedents from 146 acute and long-term care Veterans Affairs facilities between 2010 and 2011. Outcomes included: (1) palliative care consult, (2) chaplain visit, and 3) death in an inpatient hospice or palliative care unit. We also assessed "do not resuscitate" (DNR) orders. Family involvement was defined as documented discussions with the health care team in the last month of life. We used logistic regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidity, and clustered by facility. For chaplain visit, hospice or palliative care unit death, and DNR, we additionally adjusted for palliative care consults.

RESULTS:

Mean (SD) age was 74 (±12) years, 98% were men, and 19% were nonwhite. Most decedents (94.2%) had involved family. Veterans with involved family were more likely to have had a palliative care consult, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.31 (95% CI 3.90-4.76); a chaplain visit, AOR 1.18 (95% CI 1.07-1.31); and a DNR order, AOR 4.59 (95% CI 4.08-5.16) but not more likely to die in a hospice or palliative care unit.

CONCLUSION:

Family involvement at the end of life is associated with receipt of palliative care consultation and a chaplain visit and a higher likelihood of a DNR order. Clinicians should support early advance care planning for vulnerable patients who may lack family or friends.

KEYWORDS:

End-of-life care; communication; quality assessment; veterans

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for eScholarship, California Digital Library, University of California
    Loading ...
    Support Center