Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Heredity (Edinb). 2014 Oct;113(4):343-52. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.36. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

Accuracy of genomic selection models in a large population of open-pollinated families in white spruce.

Author information

1
1] Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Wood Fibre Centre, Québec, Québec, Canada [2] Canada Research Chair in Forest and Environmental Genomics and Institute for Systems and Integrative Biology, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
2
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Wood Fibre Centre, Québec, Québec, Canada.
3
Canada Research Chair in Forest and Environmental Genomics and Institute for Systems and Integrative Biology, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is of interest in breeding because of its potential for predicting the genetic value of individuals and increasing genetic gains per unit of time. To date, very few studies have reported empirical results of GS potential in the context of large population sizes and long breeding cycles such as for boreal trees. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of marker-aided selection in an undomesticated white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) population of large effective size using a GS approach. A discovery population of 1694 trees representative of 214 open-pollinated families from 43 natural populations was phenotyped for 12 wood and growth traits and genotyped for 6385 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) mined in 2660 gene sequences. GS models were built to predict estimated breeding values using all the available SNPs or SNP subsets of the largest absolute effects, and they were validated using various cross-validation schemes. The accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) varied from 0.327 to 0.435 when the training and the validation data sets shared half-sibs that were on average 90% of the accuracies achieved through traditionally estimated breeding values. The trend was also the same for validation across sites. As expected, the accuracy of GEBVs obtained after cross-validation with individuals of unknown relatedness was lower with about half of the accuracy achieved when half-sibs were present. We showed that with the marker densities used in the current study, predictions with low to moderate accuracy could be obtained within a large undomesticated population of related individuals, potentially resulting in larger gains per unit of time with GS than with the traditional approach.

PMID:
24781808
PMCID:
PMC4181072
DOI:
10.1038/hdy.2014.36
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center