Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2127-35. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3309-8. Epub 2014 Apr 26.

Optimizing success with lumbar disc arthroplasty.

Author information

1
The Orthopedic Center of St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, mfgspine@gmail.com.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

This study aimed at determining the variables that may prove useful in predicting clinical outcomes following lumbar disc arthroplasty.

METHODS:

Pre- and post-operative imaging assessments were obtained for 99 single-level lumbar disc arthroplasty patients from a prospective IDE study. The assessments and patient demographics were tested to identify variables that were significantly associated with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS:

Clinical outcome data were available for 85 % of patients at the 5-year follow-up. Numerous assessments made from the pre-operative imaging were found to have statistically significant associations with clinical outcomes at 2 and 5 years. The most notable factors were related to the amount of degeneration at the index level, with patients achieving better outcome scores at 5 years if they have higher grades of degeneration preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Several variables may prove effective at optimizing clinical outcomes including a preoperative disc height <8 mm, Modic type 2 changes adjacent to the target disc, a low amount of lordosis present at the treatment level, low levels of fatty replacement of the paraspinal musculature, a prominent amount of facet joint or disc degeneration, and the presence of flat or convex vertebral endplates. There were also post-operative findings associated with better patient outcomes including a larger percent of the endplate covered with the implant, larger implant heights, greater increases in disc space heights, and a larger increase in index level lumbar lordosis. These variables could be explored in other clinical studies to facilitate meta-analyses that could identify effective strategies to optimize clinical outcomes with lumbar disc arthroplasty.

PMID:
24770556
DOI:
10.1007/s00586-014-3309-8
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center