Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Lifetime Data Anal. 2014 Oct;20(4):538-62. doi: 10.1007/s10985-014-9295-7. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

Semicompeting risks in aging research: methods, issues and needs.

Author information

1
Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, The Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, ravi.varadhan@jhu.edu.

Abstract

A semicompeting risks problem involves two-types of events: a nonterminal and a terminal event (death). Typically, the nonterminal event is the focus of the study, but the terminal event can preclude the occurrence of the nonterminal event. Semicompeting risks are ubiquitous in studies of aging. Examples of semicompeting risk dyads include: dementia and death, frailty syndrome and death, disability and death, and nursing home placement and death. Semicompeting risk models can be divided into two broad classes: models based only on observables quantities (class [Formula: see text]) and those based on potential (latent) failure times (class [Formula: see text]). The classical illness-death model belongs to class [Formula: see text]. This model is a special case of the multistate models, which has been an active area of methodology development. During the past decade and a half, there has also been a flurry of methodological activity on semicompeting risks based on latent failure times ([Formula: see text] models). These advances notwithstanding, the semicompeting risks methodology has not penetrated biomedical research, in general, and gerontological research, in particular. Some possible reasons for this lack of uptake are: the methods are relatively new and sophisticated, conceptual problems associated with potential failure time models are difficult to overcome, paucity of expository articles aimed at educating practitioners, and non-availability of readily usable software. The main goals of this review article are: (i) to describe the major types of semicompeting risks problems arising in aging research, (ii) to provide a brief survey of the semicompeting risks methods, (iii) to suggest appropriate methods for addressing the problems in aging research, (iv) to highlight areas where more work is needed, and (v) to suggest ways to facilitate the uptake of the semicompeting risks methodology by the broader biomedical research community.

PMID:
24729136
PMCID:
PMC4430119
DOI:
10.1007/s10985-014-9295-7
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center